Re: [PATCH] don't run test 167 if killall is not installed

[David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>]

On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 09:13:38AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 04:40:01PM +1000, Tim Shimmin wrote:
> > Looks reasonable.
> > 
> > However:
> > 
> > * could use set_prog_path like we do in common.config.
> > 
> > * I wonder if one could use "kill -$pgid" on the process group
> > for fsstress instead of killall (I've never tried it :).
> 
> Dave already commited the original version, but I'll send an update
> to use set_prog_path later today.

Sorry, didn't see that Tim replied as well. set_prog_path is fine
by me too, but stopping every test from running because killall is
not present is a bit of overkill, isn't it?

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group