| To: | Tim Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] don't run test 167 if killall is not installed |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 15 May 2008 09:13:38 +0200 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <482BDAC1.7070407@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20080515053918.GA16530@xxxxxx> <482BDAC1.7070407@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 04:40:01PM +1000, Tim Shimmin wrote: > Looks reasonable. > > However: > > * could use set_prog_path like we do in common.config. > > * I wonder if one could use "kill -$pgid" on the process group > for fsstress instead of killall (I've never tried it :). Dave already commited the original version, but I'll send an update to use set_prog_path later today. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TAKE 981816 - Don't run 167 if killall is not installed, David Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] don't run test 167 if killall is not installed, David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] don't run test 167 if killall is not installed, Tim Shimmin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] don't run test 167 if killall is not installed, David Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |