Re: [PATCH] don't run test 167 if killall is not installed

xfs

Re: [PATCH] don't run test 167 if killall is not installed

To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] don't run test 167 if killall is not installed
From:	David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 15 May 2008 16:40:35 +1000
Cc:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20080515053918.GA16530@xxxxxx>
References:	<20080515053918.GA16530@xxxxxx>
Sender:	xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mutt/1.4.2.1i

On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 07:39:18AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Test 167 will leave runaway fsstress processes around in case killall is
> not installed and thus make all following tests fail.  This patch checks
> for killall beeing installed and error out otherwise.

Looks sane to me. I'll check it in in a minute....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] don't run test 167 if killall is not installed, Christoph Hellwig Re: [PATCH] don't run test 167 if killall is not installed, Tim Shimmin Re: [PATCH] don't run test 167 if killall is not installed, Christoph Hellwig Re: [PATCH] don't run test 167 if killall is not installed, David Chinner Re: [PATCH] don't run test 167 if killall is not installed, Christoph Hellwig Re: [PATCH] don't run test 167 if killall is not installed, Timothy Shimmin Re: [PATCH] don't run test 167 if killall is not installed, David Chinner <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH] don't run test 167 if killall is not installed, Tim Shimmin
Next by Date:	PARTIAL TAKE 981816 - XFSQA 008 - Takes too long on UML, David Chinner
Previous by Thread:	Re: [PATCH] don't run test 167 if killall is not installed, Timothy Shimmin
Next by Thread:	PARTIAL TAKE 981816 - XFSQA 008 - Takes too long on UML, David Chinner
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]