| To: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Jfs-discussion] Unneeded kernel threads (xfs, jfs, gfs2) |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 13 May 2008 05:28:51 -0400 |
| Cc: | Georgi Chorbadzhiyski <gf@xxxxxxxxxxx>, cluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, jfs-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Donald Douwsma <donaldd@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20080513092156.GA26736@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4828CAC6.3090402@xxxxxxxxxxx> <48292742.8090409@xxxxxxx> <482951C3.60600@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20080513090311.GZ155679365@xxxxxxx> <20080513092156.GA26736@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) |
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 05:21:56AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Well, we could refcount the number of active xfs instances and > start/stop the global threads based on that. Not really worth my > time IHMO, but if someone comes up with a clean enough patch it should > go in. Actually doing it in the VFS might be even better. Add ->init and ->exit methods to struct file_system_type and then the filesystems can move most of module_init/exit into the new methods. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Jfs-discussion] Unneeded kernel threads (xfs, jfs, gfs2), Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Unneeded kernel threads (xfs, jfs, gfs2), Lennart Sorensen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Jfs-discussion] Unneeded kernel threads (xfs, jfs, gfs2), Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Jfs-discussion] Unneeded kernel threads (xfs, jfs, gfs2), Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |