xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Unneeded kernel threads (xfs, jfs, gfs2)

To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Unneeded kernel threads (xfs, jfs, gfs2)
From: Georgi Chorbadzhiyski <gf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 11:36:02 +0300
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, jfs-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, cluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0805130115090.25441@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Unix Solutions Ltd.
References: <4828CAC6.3090402@xxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.LNX.1.10.0805130115090.25441@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421)
Jan Engelhardt mumbled something about, On 5/13/08 2:21 AM:
On Tuesday 2008-05-13 00:55, Georgi Chorbadzhiyski wrote:
Not needed here, because no jfs partition is in use.
Not needed here, because no xfs partition is in use.
I dont use gfs2

You miss the best of Linux. So, why not unload the modules?

ext3 is working just fine for now, thanks (:

 1141 ?        S<     0:00  \_ [block-osm/1]
What is osm? Can't find anything in kernel config?

drivers/message/i2o/i2o_block.c:#define OSM_NAME        "block-osm"

 1148 ?        S<     0:00  \_ [khpsbpkt]
What is this?

ieee1394/ieee1394_core.c:static struct task_struct *khpsbpkt_thread;

Strange names :)

--
Georgi Chorbadzhiyski
http://georgi.unixsol.org/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>