xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Unneeded kernel threads (xfs, jfs, gfs2)

To: Georgi Chorbadzhiyski <gf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Unneeded kernel threads (xfs, jfs, gfs2)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 01:21:19 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, jfs-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, cluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <4828CAC6.3090402@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4828CAC6.3090402@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Alpine 1.10 (LNX 962 2008-03-14)
On Tuesday 2008-05-13 00:55, Georgi Chorbadzhiyski wrote:
>
>Not needed here, because no jfs partition is in use.
>Not needed here, because no xfs partition is in use.
>I dont use gfs2

You miss the best of Linux. So, why not unload the modules?

>>  1141 ?        S<     0:00  \_ [block-osm/1]
>
>What is osm? Can't find anything in kernel config?

drivers/message/i2o/i2o_block.c:#define OSM_NAME        "block-osm"

>>  1148 ?        S<     0:00  \_ [khpsbpkt]
>
>What is this?

ieee1394/ieee1394_core.c:static struct task_struct *khpsbpkt_thread;


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>