xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] don't run test 167 if killall is not installed

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] don't run test 167 if killall is not installed
From: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 11:45:37 +1000
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20080515073837.GA28530@lst.de>
References: <20080515053918.GA16530@lst.de> <482BDAC1.7070407@sgi.com> <20080515071338.GA26247@lst.de> <20080515073605.GR155679365@sgi.com> <20080515073837.GA28530@lst.de>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421)
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 05:36:05PM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
>>> Dave already commited the original version, but I'll send an update
>>> to use set_prog_path later today.
>> Sorry, didn't see that Tim replied as well. set_prog_path is fine
>> by me too, but stopping every test from running because killall is
>> not present is a bit of overkill, isn't it?
> 
> My plan was to use it in 167 not common.config.  But I don't really care
> either way.

Yeah, I was just meaning for 167 too.

--Tim


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>