| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] XFS tuning on software RAID5 partitionable array; error in xfsprogs 2.9.8 |
| From: | Hubert Verstraete <hubskml@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 16 May 2008 12:35:52 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <47EA99AD.9060400@free.fr> |
| References: | <47D90614.9040206@free.fr> <18408.36753.223347.129420@notabene.brown> <47E92EE2.1080108@free.fr> <20080326065232.GA21970@percy.comedia.it> <47EA71BF.8050800@tmr.com> <47EA8CF4.7080201@free.fr> <47EA99AD.9060400@free.fr> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20071019) |
Hello First, thank you for including the patch in xfsprogs-2.9.8. I have just reviewed the new source code; unfortunately, I found out a change from the original patch that could generate a segmentation fault. The line 89 in libdisk/md.c is: "free(dfile2);" but it should have remained "if (dfile2) free(dfile2);" because dfile2 is null in case mkfs.xfs is run on an MD device. Regards, Hubert Verstraete Hubert Verstraete wrote: Hi XFS list, |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] Fix inode list allocation size in writeback., David Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Fix inode list allocation size in writeback., Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] Fix inode list allocation size in writeback., David Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] XFS tuning on software RAID5 partitionable array; error in xfsprogs 2.9.8, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |