| To: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfsqa 166 failure |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 2 May 2008 08:04:50 +0200 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20080501224237.GO108924158@sgi.com> |
| References: | <20080501205004.GA30384@lst.de> <20080501224237.GO108924158@sgi.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 08:42:37AM +1000, David Chinner wrote: > gawk supports C comment syntax inside procedure blocks and doesn't > interpret them as regexes. I think the standard comment syntax > is supposed to be like bash - use "#". Of course, the gawk man > page doesn't define comment syntax at all, but mawk does. > > Does the patch below fix it? Yes, this fixes it. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TAKE 981091 - Don't allow memory reclaim to wait on the filesystem in inode writeback, David Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Don't use d_alloc_anon for open_by_handle, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfsqa 166 failure, David Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | xfsqa 173 failure, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |