Index: fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c,v
retrieving revision 1.495
diff -u -r1.495 xfs_inode.c
--- fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c	22 Feb 2008 03:05:49 -0000	1.495
+++ fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c	4 Apr 2008 14:55:46 -0000
@@ -1799,11 +1799,6 @@
 	ASSERT(ismrlocked(&(ip->i_iolock), MR_UPDATE) != 0);
 	ASSERT(new_size > ip->i_size);
 
-	/*
-	 * Zero any pages that may have been created by
-	 * xfs_write_file() beyond the end of the file
-	 * and any blocks between the old and new file sizes.
-	 */
 	return xfs_zero_eof(ip, new_size, ip->i_size);
 }
 
Index: fs/xfs/xfs_rw.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_rw.c,v
retrieving revision 1.399
diff -u -r1.399 xfs_rw.c
--- fs/xfs/xfs_rw.c	24 Aug 2007 16:13:42 -0000	1.399
+++ fs/xfs/xfs_rw.c	4 Apr 2008 14:55:47 -0000
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+
 /*
  * Copyright (c) 2000-2006 Silicon Graphics, Inc.
  * All Rights Reserved.
@@ -114,7 +115,7 @@
 		 * the fact that buffered writes lock out direct I/O
 		 * writes - the direct I/O write could have extended
 		 * the size nontransactionally, then finished before
-		 * we started.  xfs_write_file will think that the file
+		 * we started.  xfs_write will think that the file
 		 * didn't grow but the update isn't safe unless the
 		 * size change is logged.
 		 *