| To: | Tru Huynh <tru@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: CentOS project? <- (Re: Problems with xfs_grow on large LVM + XFS filesystem 20TB size check 2 failed) |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:54:36 -0500 |
| Cc: | markgw@xxxxxxx, Lance Reed <lreed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20080430113154.GA26651@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <6A32BC807C106440B7E23208F280DDAF01D21F36FD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <481650F5.40205@xxxxxxxxxxx> <6A32BC807C106440B7E23208F280DDAF01D21F3718@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <481656F6.5030300@xxxxxxxxxxx> <48166E18.10008@xxxxxxx> <48166F42.50104@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20080430113154.GA26651@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226) |
Tru Huynh wrote: > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 07:43:46PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > ... >> Honestly, I think nothing makes its way back to Centos... I really don't >> have the time to maintain it. If anyone on the list uses Centos + xfs >> and wants to backport patches that appear to be bugfixes, I'm sure it'd >> be welcomed. I'd be happy to facilitate w/ review or whatnot, but >> probably won't have time to actually take on this task myself (despite >> being the instigator of the centos module originally, which was, in >> retrospect, perhaps a tad irresponsible...) :) > > Let's start a new CentOS project http://wiki.centos.org/Projects > for kmod-xfs CentOS-4 and 5. Sounds good to me. I think Karanbir is going to set this up. -Eric > Cheers, > > Tru |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Remove l_flushsema, David Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Remove l_flushsema, Matthew Wilcox |
| Previous by Thread: | CentOS project? <- (Re: Problems with xfs_grow on large LVM + XFS filesystem 20TB size check 2 failed), Tru Huynh |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Problems with xfs_grow on large LVM + XFS filesystem 20TB size check 2 failed, David Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |