xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: CentOS project? <- (Re: Problems with xfs_grow on large LVM + XFS fi

To: Tru Huynh <tru@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: CentOS project? <- (Re: Problems with xfs_grow on large LVM + XFS filesystem 20TB size check 2 failed)
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:54:36 -0500
Cc: markgw@xxxxxxx, Lance Reed <lreed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20080430113154.GA26651@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <6A32BC807C106440B7E23208F280DDAF01D21F36FD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <481650F5.40205@xxxxxxxxxxx> <6A32BC807C106440B7E23208F280DDAF01D21F3718@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <481656F6.5030300@xxxxxxxxxxx> <48166E18.10008@xxxxxxx> <48166F42.50104@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20080430113154.GA26651@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226)
Tru Huynh wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 07:43:46PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> ...
>> Honestly, I think nothing makes its way back to Centos... I really don't
>> have the time to maintain it.  If anyone on the list uses Centos + xfs
>> and wants to backport patches that appear to be bugfixes, I'm sure it'd
>> be welcomed.  I'd be happy to facilitate w/ review or whatnot, but
>> probably won't have time to actually take on this task myself (despite
>> being the instigator of the centos module originally, which was, in
>> retrospect, perhaps a tad irresponsible...)  :)
> 
> Let's start a new CentOS project http://wiki.centos.org/Projects
> for kmod-xfs CentOS-4 and 5.

Sounds good to me.  I think Karanbir is going to set this up.

-Eric

> Cheers,
> 
> Tru


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>