| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Problems with xfs_grow on large LVM + XFS filesystem 20TB size check 2 failed |
| From: | Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:38:48 +1000 |
| Cc: | Lance Reed <lreed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <481656F6.5030300@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | SGI Engineering |
| References: | <6A32BC807C106440B7E23208F280DDAF01D21F36FD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <481650F5.40205@xxxxxxxxxxx> <6A32BC807C106440B7E23208F280DDAF01D21F3718@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <481656F6.5030300@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | markgw@xxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.14 (Windows/20071210) |
Eric Sandeen wrote: Lance Reed wrote:Thanks for the quick response. Actually, I was able to run an xfs_repair and all was well.(took 45 minutes...) But I would love to be able to expand the XFS file system out to the max. I guess I could expand it in < 2TB increments then maybe? Thanks for the update and I will look around. I did find this which I think is related. http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00097.htmlYep, I think expanding it in, say, 1T increments should be fine, and it should all (I think...) end up the same as if you'd done it all at once (modulo the bug, of course...) I think we verified a while back that growing in 2T increments is an effective workaround - the bug is due to a signed 32 bit overflow. The fix has been available for some time now, but apparently hasn't made it's way into Centos yet. Cheers -- Mark Goodwin markgw@xxxxxxx Engineering Manager for XFS and PCP Phone: +61-3-99631937 SGI Australian Software Group Cell: +61-4-18969583 ------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH, XFSQA] Don't run 175-177 if DMAPI is not supported, David Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE 979416 - Don't initialise new inode generation numbers to zero, David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Problems with xfs_grow on large LVM + XFS filesystem 20TB size check 2 failed, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Problems with xfs_grow on large LVM + XFS filesystem 20TB size check 2 failed, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |