| To: | Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: reduce stack usage in xfs_bmap_btalloc() |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:52:33 +1000 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4815A7A5.9040507@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Aconex |
| References: | <200804261651.02078.vda.linux__2040.04651536724$1209223026$gmane$org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87iqy4wfjq.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080426200701.GA10883@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080426202630.GG17905@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080426202323.GA14245@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1209341212.23166.122.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4815A7A5.9040507@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | nscott@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 12:32 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > and > > its a side-effect of needing to do that (all the code > > dealing with specifics of ondisk format is shared). > > But does that really need "STATIC"? Seems doubtful to me. In userspace STATIC is defined to nothing, and the tools (and/or libxfs) directly call into numerous functions that are (really) static in the kernel. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Problems with xfs_grow on large LVM + XFS filesystem 20TB size check 2 failed, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH, XFSQA] Don't run 175-177 if DMAPI is not supported, David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: reduce stack usage in xfs_bmap_btalloc(), Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Your message to Mendo_recce awaits moderator approval, mendo_recce-bounces |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |