| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: reduce stack usage in xfs_bmap_btalloc() |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:06:51 +1000 |
| Cc: | Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20080426202323.GA14245@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Aconex |
| References: | <200804261651.02078.vda.linux__2040.04651536724$1209223026$gmane$org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87iqy4wfjq.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080426200701.GA10883@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080426202630.GG17905@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080426202323.GA14245@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | nscott@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 16:23 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > > Date: > Sat, 26 Apr 2008 16:23:23 -0400 > (Sun, 06:23 EST) > > > On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 10:26:30PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > STATIC as defined by xfs already does this.. > > > > Weird. Unexpected. Different from everyone else. Is this some > exercise in > > obfuscation? > > The whole STATIC thing is weird to start with.. > Having to compile chunks of XFS code in both kernel and userspace is also wierd (relative to other drivers), and its a side-effect of needing to do that (all the code dealing with specifics of ondisk format is shared). cheers. -- Nathan |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: reduce stack usage in xfs_bmap_btalloc(), Denys Vlasenko |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH, XFSQA] Don't run 175-177 if DMAPI is not supported, Timothy Shimmin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: reduce stack usage in xfs_bmap_btalloc(), Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: reduce stack usage in xfs_bmap_btalloc(), Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |