xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS drops create/delete files to 6.6% of EXT3 (software raid) and to

To: Michael Darling <darlingm@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS drops create/delete files to 6.6% of EXT3 (software raid) and to 0.6% of EXT3 (3ware hardware raid)
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:18:11 -0500
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <c33e4330804231848n72ce683cqd48a8d45937f302@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <c33e4330804231848n72ce683cqd48a8d45937f302@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213)
Michael Darling wrote:
> I am preparing a new server, and benchmarking EXT3 against XFS, both using
> software RAID and hardware RAID using a 3ware 9650SE-4LPML.
> 
> Using bonnie++ as a benchmark, I am seeing significant performance boosts in
> my block sequential reads and writes moving from EXT3 to XFS.  I am aware
> that XFS won't create and delete files as quickly as EXT3, however I am
> seeing drops from 29455/second to 1957/second using software RAID, and from
> 32524/second to 189/second using hardware RAID.  I'm not sure if when using
> software raid, if creating and deleting files should drop to 6.6% of EXT3.
> But, what I'm pretty sure of, is when using hardware raid, that creating and
> deleting files shouldn't drop to 0.6% of EXT3.

Chris Mason reminded me that bonnie++ may not be creating enough files
to actually cause much if any IO on ext3; you might play with the -n
option to get it to the point where it's actually doing a significant
number of creates (I don't know what the default is offhand... checks
source... it's 16k maybe?) but more sustained creation might be interesting.

-Eric


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>