Re: [REVIEW] Remove unused HAVE

xfs

Re: [REVIEW] Remove unused HAVE_SPLICE macro

To:	Donald Douwsma <donaldd@xxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [REVIEW] Remove unused HAVE_SPLICE macro
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:41:09 -0400
Cc:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20080411072832.98C2C58C4C15@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<20080411072832.98C2C58C4C15@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 05:28:32PM +1000, Donald Douwsma wrote:
> Still more 2.4 build remnants to get rid of...
> 
> HAVE_SPLICE was part of the infrastructure for building 2.4 and 2.6
> kernels out of the same tree. Now we don't build 2.4 kernels this 
> way anymore its unused.

Looks good.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[REVIEW] Remove unused HAVE_SPLICE macro, Donald Douwsma Re: [REVIEW] Remove unused HAVE_SPLICE macro, Christoph Hellwig <=

Previous by Date:	Re: odd code in xfs_remove, Christoph Hellwig
Next by Date:	About external log and barriers, Emmanuel Florac
Previous by Thread:	[REVIEW] Remove unused HAVE_SPLICE macro, Donald Douwsma
Next by Thread:	About external log and barriers, Emmanuel Florac
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]