| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Lost+found |
| From: | Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:07:07 +1000 |
| Cc: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Barry Naujok <bnaujok@xxxxxxx>, Jeffrey Sandel <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20080409132945.GA25114@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Christoph Hellwig's message of "Wed, 9 Apr 2008 09:29:45 -0400") |
| References: | <1207632033.11530.10.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <op.t9bm23aa3jf8g2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.1.10.0804090628080.322@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47FCC071.40201@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20080409132945.GA25114@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.60 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) |
Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 08:11:13AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> The whole reason they're in lost+found is because they are "orphaned" - >> allocated & in use but not referenced by any directory... so the best >> xfs_repair can do is rename to lost+found with the inode number. > > At least until we get parent pointers. Niv, any updates? I was lost in DMAPI land for a while, I'll resume work on PP next week, patches up for review soonish after I fix some issues. Cheers, -- Niv Sardi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] simplify xfs_lock_for_rename, Barry Naujok |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: iget behaviour in xlog_recover_process_iunlinks, Timothy Shimmin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Lost+found, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Lost+found, Emmanuel Florac |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |