| To: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: TAKE 979087 - Test 091 fails on sector size != 512 bytes |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 9 Apr 2008 15:15:18 -0400 |
| Cc: | sgi.bugs.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20080408022933.170C258C4C0F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20080408022933.170C258C4C0F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) |
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 12:29:32PM +1000, David Chinner wrote: > Test 091 fails on sector size != 512 bytes > > Test 091 assumes a direct I/O alignment of 512 bytes, > a hold over from 2.4 kernels. On 2.6. kernels, direct > I/O needs to be aligned to the sector size the filesystem > was mkfs'd with. Actually this makes 091 fail in my kvm test setup now: 091 49s ... - output mismatch (see 091.out.bad) 1a2,7 > meta-data=DDEV isize=XXX agcount=N, agsize=XXX blks > data = bsize=XXX blocks=XXX, imaxpct=PCT > = sunit=XXX swidth=XXX, unwritten=X > naming =VERN bsize=XXX > log =LDEV bsize=XXX blocks=XXX > realtime =RDEV extsz=XXX blocks=XXX, rtextents=XXX |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Portability of libattr, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | test 001 oopses starting from today, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | TAKE 979087 - Test 091 fails on sector size != 512 bytes, David Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: TAKE 979087 - Test 091 fails on sector size != 512 bytes, David Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |