xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Problems with xfs_grow on large LVM + XFS filesystem 20TB size check

To: Lance Reed <lreed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Problems with xfs_grow on large LVM + XFS filesystem 20TB size check 2 failed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:24:59 -0500
Cc: "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <6A32BC807C106440B7E23208F280DDAF01D21F3BA8@bcmail1.VIDMARK.LOCAL>
References: <6A32BC807C106440B7E23208F280DDAF01D21F36FD@bcmail1.VIDMARK.LOCAL> <481650F5.40205@sandeen.net> <6A32BC807C106440B7E23208F280DDAF01D21F3718@bcmail1.VIDMARK.LOCAL> <481656F6.5030300@sandeen.net> <48166E18.10008@sgi.com> <48166F42.50104@sandeen.net> <6A32BC807C106440B7E23208F280DDAF01D21F384B@bcmail1.VIDMARK.LOCAL> <48175046.5050405@sandeen.net> <6A32BC807C106440B7E23208F280DDAF01D21F3870@bcmail1.VIDMARK.LOCAL> <481752F9.8040600@sandeen.net> <6A32BC807C106440B7E23208F280DDAF01D21F3BA8@bcmail1.VIDMARK.LOCAL>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213)
Lance Reed wrote:
> Great!
> That is exactly what I needed to know.
> 
> One follow up question:
> 
> Can I assume that the bug:
> TAKE 959978 - growing an XFS filesystem by more than 2TB is broken
> is a problem only with the the xfs_growfs code?  The reason I asked is that 
> when I first made the original filesystem, I created it using mkfs.xfs and it 
> succeeded fine for 10.5 TB.
> 
> # mkfs.xfs /dev/VolGroupNAS200/LogVolNAS200
> meta-data=/dev/VolGroupNAS200/LogVolNAS200 isize=256    agcount=32, 
> agsize=83886080 blks
>          =                       sectsz=512   attr=0
> data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=2684354560, imaxpct=25
>          =                       sunit=0      swidth=0 blks, unwritten=1
> naming   =version 2              bsize=4096
> log      =internal log           bsize=4096   blocks=32768, version=1
>          =                       sectsz=512   sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=0
> realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=
> 
> so I am assuming the rest of the XFS setup can handle large Filesystems fine. 
>  I am just trying to confirm that the probem is TAKE 959978 and that doing it 
> in less than 2 TB increments should be fine.

yes, it was just in the growth path.

-Eric


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>