| To: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Don't initialise new inode generation numbers to zero V2 |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:59:22 -0400 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Greg Banks <gnb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-dev <xfs-dev@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20080428031120.GD103491721@sgi.com> |
| References: | <20080422015806.GU108924158@sgi.com> <480D641B.8060301@melbourne.sgi.com> <20080422050447.GV103491721@sgi.com> <20080425085750.GA6395@infradead.org> <20080428031120.GD103491721@sgi.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) |
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 01:11:20PM +1000, David Chinner wrote: > Ok, so is random32() good enough or does it need to be get_random_int()? I'm not sure offhand what random32 actually is, but a not cryptographically strong random number should be enough. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: REVIEW: 980021 - fix up noattr2 mount option, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE 980007 - XFSQA 008 - Fix intermittent failure on 64k pagesize, David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Don't initialise new inode generation numbers to zero V2, David Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Don't initialise new inode generation numbers to zero V2, David Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |