Re: [PATCH, XFSQA] Don't run 175-177 if DMAPI is not supported

[David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 04:58:12PM +1000, Timothy Shimmin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> _test_punch already does a umount $SCRATCH_MNT.
> However, IMHO, it would probably be nicer if one could
> use a _require_dmapi or really it may be simpler if
> we could roll it into common.dmapi
> so one just needs to include common.dmapi and
> it would complain at that point if the kernel
> didn't support it.

Sure, but we don't have that, and I'm not about to spend the time to
convert >20 tests to something like this. Right now I just want to
remove all the bloody silly test failures on mainline kernels.

All the other dmapi tests "not run" just fine, I want these to do
the same thing. Is that good enough to check in right now?

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group