xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: PARTIAL TAKE 976035 - kill usesless IHOLD calls in xfs_rename

from [Lachlan McIlroy] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PARTIAL TAKE 976035 - kill usesless IHOLD calls in xfs_rename
From: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:53:49 +1000
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20080421060836.GA31296@infradead.org>
References: <20080421052419.E52E458C4C15@chook.melbourne.sgi.com> <20080421060836.GA31296@infradead.org>
Reply-to: lachlan@xxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080213)
Christoph Hellwig wrote: 
Any reason you didn't commit:

  [PATCH 1/2] kill parent == child checks in xfs_remove and xfs_rmdir
  [PATCH 2/2] kill usesless IHOLD calls in xfs_remove and xfs_rmdir

in this round, it's pretty much the equivalent treatment to remove and
rmdir that we did to rename in this and the previous patch.


No intentional reason.  For some reason I didn't apply them when I tested
the last batch.  They're going through QA now and I'll check them in soon.



[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: PARTIAL TAKE 976035 - kill usesless IHOLD calls in xfs_rename, Christoph Hellwig
Next by Date:  Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.26-rc1, Lachlan McIlroy
Previous by Thread:  Re: PARTIAL TAKE 976035 - kill usesless IHOLD calls in xfs_rename, Christoph Hellwig
Next by Thread:  TAKE 980581 - xfs_repair - using to much memory on a PAE 32-bit system, Barry Naujok
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]