| To: | Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: x86: 4kstacks default |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 20 Apr 2008 09:59:39 -0700 |
| Cc: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Oliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@xxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20080420074228.GE1595@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> |
| References: | <200804181737.m3IHbabI010051@hera.kernel.org> <20080418142934.38ce6bf4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080419142329.GA5339@elte.hu> <6101e8c40804190735g17f1e0bj25c2bc0e2a6eac26@mail.gmail.com> <20080419151911.GB1595@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <480AA2B9.10305@sandeen.net> <20080420074228.GE1595@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 10:42:28AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > We are going from 6k to 4k. 6k? > Why should users have to poke with such deeply internal things? > That doesn't sound right. they shouldn't, so a 4k default is a problem for them > Excessive stack usage in the kernel is considered to be a bug. define excessive > We should identify and fix all remaining problems (if any). let's see your patches then |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: x86: 4kstacks default, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.26-rc1, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: x86: 4kstacks default, Adrian Bunk |
| Next by Thread: | Re: x86: 4kstacks default, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |