| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | iget behaviour in xlog_recover_process_iunlinks |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:04:53 +0200 |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
shouldn't we call xfs_iget with the XFS_IGET_CREATE flag here? the code seems to be perfectly happy with zero-ed out inodes as long as di_next_unlinked is valid. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH 2/2] simplify xfs_lock_for_rename, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] simplify xfs_lock_for_rename, Barry Naujok |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 2/2] simplify xfs_lock_for_rename, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: iget behaviour in xlog_recover_process_iunlinks, Timothy Shimmin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |