xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [REVIEW #3] cleanup - remove bhv_vname_t

To: Barry Naujok <bnaujok@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [REVIEW #3] cleanup - remove bhv_vname_t
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 03:49:24 -0400
Cc: "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-dev <xfs-dev@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <op.t9b1ien03jf8g2@pc-bnaujok.melbourne.sgi.com>
References: <op.t9b1ien03jf8g2@pc-bnaujok.melbourne.sgi.com>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 05:24:04PM +1000, Barry Naujok wrote:
> +     ASSERT(ip1);

No need for an assert here, there's only one caller and we know it's
there.


Except for that nitpick the patch looks fine to me.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>