| To: | Jan Derfinak <ja@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Poor VMWare disk performance on XFS partition |
| From: | Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 24 Mar 2008 09:00:04 -0500 |
| Cc: | "Hendrik ." <chasake@xxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.64.0803240126501.4354@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <876423.51989.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0803240126501.4354@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) |
Jan Derfinak wrote: I can verify that ... barriers are killers when running vmware guest disk/memory images.On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Hendrik . wrote:I've been converting some of my drives from EXT3 to XFS a while ago. Now I notice poor disk performance when using XFS as underlying filesystem for a VMware virtual drive. I did some experiments and it really seems to be the XFS filesystem 'trashing' the speed of a VMware Windows XP guest.Mount XFS partition with "nobarrier" option. I'm using also logbufs=8,logbsize=256k for vmware. jan The preallocation would also help out quite bit if you don't mind dedicating the disk space vs the sparse file method, which allow for over subscribing the physical space. Going through once in a while and shutting down the guests and defragmenting it a good idea. I would be interested to find out the results of seekwatcher on shutdown but I have also seen the long shutdowns. -Russell |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [RFC PATCH] freeze feature ver 1.0, Takashi Sato |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Confirm Your E-mail Address, ksu.edu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Poor VMWare disk performance on XFS partition, Jan Derfinak |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Poor VMWare disk performance on XFS partition, Peter Grandi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |