xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

xfs for free hosting on linux ? performance questions

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: xfs for free hosting on linux ? performance questions
From: Rekrutacja <rekrutacja119@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 22:39:50 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+nT1De/lMdf9Em5p5ssrhE8x1oiLyBw5+/peEmriqBs=; b=kgdENgP5Aj7Uw8MwAt9IX3TpseNCzV6H6mFQAuA5fDMG979G4Hfi3ChkkHA6eqd6Tcl8p2PSLbCM01hf70ecOC6BNSlM9XJGRsbu/aSh2E+9BuQ1EAwewpl8Q0b52JPSvrV0z/nhhtPO5g1JLIoVT3pWx7ngWIaBP8FlHzc1HGg=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lTddhYXpl78G+ftYMR7GYYpZdcP4LCofREoXkJ2YTGT9ONLTQVwJYepmeGbfTWWJgmCLrQjbx5pRYdQY0KfFjW1UbePcwBgz7mTNatLoaeW+1K6gbLfpLiyEHEYe/aV0K7S+sY08q1a+0Uysfy056JzIOSdYR0f8ToFHTRmUYA4=
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213)
hello, i'm going to create xfs on RAID 5 array consiting of 5 drives, each 500GB, it will be software raid made with mdadm on linux. i run free hosting, and the array is only for users files (system and such are on ext3).

what options do you recommend while creating and while mounting? i had performance problems while testing this setup with bonnie++ and postmark (postmark especially).

data will be in many directories, users files are in /var/www/users/username and i have more than 100 000 accounts. also a policy to make max 3 MB files, so most of my files are around 50 KB i think.

so knowing this all, what would you advice me if i may ask? my current idea was like this:

mkfs.xfs -l size=128m,lazy-count=1
mount -o nobarrier,noatime,logbufs=8,logbsize=256k

this will have full backup, so i'm more after performance, not stability, so if you can give me some performance tips... (postmark run on array made from 4 disks, not 5, durning test, with parameters - number of files 10k, transactions 10k, subdirs 20k, was giving very very slow reads, around 200KB/s, while reiser4/btrfs were like 2MB/s reads, but even ext3 was faster - any idea why? i tested on 2.6.24.3 and 2.6.25-rc4 )

i keep seeing tests like this: http://www.t2-project.org/zine/1/
also, i have real life example, that 3 disks RAID-0 array with tweaked xfs is as fast as just one disk with reiser4 (my free hosting with millions of files)

i know reiser4 is not stable (i also experienced this), so i'm asking if you know any additional tips to tweak xfs, or maybe you know why it has performance problems in some situations.

thanks in advance


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>