On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 10:00:56PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> It looks like all of the below is unused... and according
> to Nathan,
> "dont think it even got used/implemented anywhere, but i think it
> was meant to be an auto-mount kinda thing... such that when you look
> up at that point, it knows to mount the device with that uuid there,
> if its not already it was never really written anywhere ... just an
> idea in doug doucettes brain i think."
> Think it'll ever go anywhere, or should it get pruned?
> The below builds; not at all tested, until I get an idea if it's worth
> doing. Need to double check that some structures might not need padding
> out to keep things compatible/consistent...
This looks fine to me. But please keep the XFS_DINODE_FMT_UUID enum
value and add a big comment close to it documenting what it was an maybe
a approximate removal date so people who care about it can look it up
in the SCM history easily.