| To: | Donald Douwsma <donaldd@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [REVIEW] Don't make lazy counters default for mkfs |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 03 Mar 2008 11:24:09 +1100 |
| Cc: | Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Barry Naujok <bnaujok@xxxxxxx>, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <47CB43EE.3060405@xxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Aconex |
| References: | <op.t67mtawg3jf8g2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1204166101.13569.102.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47C87775.2010007@xxxxxxxxxxx> <47C89137.3070805@xxxxxxxxxxx> <47C89303.7070902@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1204500895.10190.3.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47CB43EE.3060405@xxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | nscott@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 11:18 +1100, Donald Douwsma wrote: > > > Could work but I dont like the idea of using -f for anything but > mkfsing an > existing filesystem. If that becomes habit for people it could lead to > disasters. Its already used for more than just overwriting existing filesystems. :) And it is already habit for some people. Which leads to disasters, yes. Its not a perfect system, but there's only so much you can do for people before they shoot themselves in the foot. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [REVIEW] Don't make lazy counters default for mkfs, Donald Douwsma |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [REVIEW] Don't make lazy counters default for mkfs, Mark Goodwin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [REVIEW] Don't make lazy counters default for mkfs, Donald Douwsma |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [REVIEW] Don't make lazy counters default for mkfs, Barry Naujok |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |