| To: | Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [REVIEW] Don't make lazy counters default for mkfs |
| From: | "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <jeffpc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 2 Mar 2008 05:41:53 -0500 |
| Cc: | Barry Naujok <bnaujok@xxxxxxx>, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <87ir05h16o.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <op.t67mtawg3jf8g2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87ir05h16o.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) |
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 11:26:07AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > "Barry Naujok" <bnaujok@xxxxxxx> writes: > > > > Lazy counters will default to on again in xfsprogs 2.10.0 (when CI > > support is released). > > CI is what? Case-insensitivity aka. case-folding. Josef 'Jeff' Sipek. -- Bad pun of the week: The formula 1 control computer suffered from a race condition |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [REVIEW] Don't make lazy counters default for mkfs, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO report, Iustin Pop |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [REVIEW] Don't make lazy counters default for mkfs, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [REVIEW] Don't make lazy counters default for mkfs, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |