| To: | markgw@xxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [REVIEW] Don't make lazy counters default for mkfs |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:11:03 -0600 |
| Cc: | Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>, nscott@xxxxxxxxxx, Barry Naujok <bnaujok@xxxxxxx>, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <47C89B94.4060002@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <op.t67mtawg3jf8g2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1204166101.13569.102.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47C87775.2010007@xxxxxxxxxxx> <47C89137.3070805@xxxxxxxxxxx> <47C89303.7070902@xxxxxxxxxxx> <47C8997A.9030804@xxxxxxx> <47C89B94.4060002@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) |
Eric Sandeen wrote: > maybe just 2 values, with the actual supported features (& features2) > values anded together? Easy enough to parse in the code. > > i.e. > > # cat /proc/fs/xfs/features > 0xffffffff > 0x00000001 hm, but of course mkfs should never be checking for anything in the first features slot; yesterday's kernels support all those flags but don't export anything. wow, this is starting to feel as complex as ext4's flags ;) -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [REVIEW] Don't make lazy counters default for mkfs, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Linux XFS filesystem corruption (XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO), slaton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [REVIEW] Don't make lazy counters default for mkfs, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [REVIEW] Don't make lazy counters default for mkfs, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |