xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TAKE 977771 -

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: TAKE 977771 -
From: Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:47:05 +1100
Cc: Niv Sardi-Altivanik <xaiki@xxxxxxx>, sgi.bugs.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <47C72FC5.7030908@xxxxxxxxxxx> (Eric Sandeen's message of "Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:03:49 -0600")
References: <20080228003236.9050858C4C0F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47C72FC5.7030908@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.60 (i486-pc-linux-gnu)
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Niv Sardi-Altivanik wrote:
>> If you mount an XFS filesystem with no mount options at all, then
>> the "ikeep" option is set rather than "noikeep".
>
> Thanks for getting this in.
>
> 2 questions...
>
> Is it going to make 2.6.25?

I hope so, but as I've been told to stay away from git trees it's in
lachlan's (over-busy) hands.

> And can you add a little text description to your subject line, for
> those doing inbox searches for things?  :)

Yep, sorry, I thought our tools were not that d^W^W^Wsmarter than they
are.

Cheers,
-- 
Niv Sardi


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>