xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [xfs-masters] Re: filesystem corruption on xfs after 2.6.25-rc1 (bis

To: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [xfs-masters] Re: filesystem corruption on xfs after 2.6.25-rc1 (bisected, powerpc related?)
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:40:27 -0600
Cc: Gaudenz Steinlin <gaudenz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1204049492.13162.265.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20080225112310.GA5516@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200802260052.57875.rjw@xxxxxxx> <20080225235703.GA17530@xxxxxx> <200802260113.57875.rjw@xxxxxxx> <20080226114419.GA5353@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1204049492.13162.265.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031)
Johannes Berg wrote:
>> I debuged this a bit further by testing the 4 changed functions
>> individually. The problem only occurs with the new version of
>> xfs_lowbit64. 
...

> You really need to keep xfs_lowbit64 defined as it was before, or, maybe
> even better, define ffs64 in parallel to fls64.

Yep, I agree.

-Eric


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [xfs-masters] Re: filesystem corruption on xfs after 2.6.25-rc1 (bisected, powerpc related?), Eric Sandeen <=