| To: | Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Marking inode dirty latency > 1000 msec on XFS! |
| From: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:16:08 +1100 |
| Cc: | Török Edwin <edwintorok@xxxxxxxxx>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <47BE6C5C.2000605@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <47B5DD9C.3080906@xxxxxxxxx> <47BE6C5C.2000605@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 05:31:56PM +1100, Lachlan McIlroy wrote: > Török Edwin wrote: > >FWIW, this is a slow laptop hdd (5400 rpm, ST96812AS), but latency of 1 > >second is still big. > > > >Are there any settings I can tweak to reduce latency? > Um, not that I am aware of. Try using a filesystem that has lazy-count enabled. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC, patch 1/2] Allow up to 1GB logs in mkfs.xfs, David Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [REVIEW] User-space support for bad_features2 patch, Barry Naujok |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Marking inode dirty latency > 1000 msec on XFS!, Lachlan McIlroy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Marking inode dirty latency > 1000 msec on XFS!, Török Edwin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |