xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Is CVS stable?

To: eric c <xcellula@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Is CVS stable?
From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:21:20 +1100
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <eb736a810802200026g1b956abar922548d3e67a9682@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <eb736a810802200026g1b956abar922548d3e67a9682@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 02:26:42AM -0600, eric c wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I have recently seen some patches for slabcache related
> xfs_inode/xfs_vnode_t/dentry_cache taking up alot of memory:
>   http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2007-12/msg00154.html
>   http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-02/msg00138.html
> 
> If I cvs on linux-2.6-xfs, is it stable for production or bleeding?

Mostly stable, but it is our _development_ tree and that means it
can be broken at any given time. And by "broken" I mean corrupt your
filesystems and lose all your data. IOWs, use the CVS tree in
production at your own risk.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>