| To: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch] detect and correct bad features2 superblock field |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:13:28 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs-dev <xfs-dev@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20080220054041.GM155407@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20080220054041.GM155407@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) |
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 04:40:41PM +1100, David Chinner wrote: > There is a bug in mkfs.xfs that can result in writing the features2 > field in the superblock to the wrong location. This only occurs > on some architectures, typically those with 32 bit userspace and > 64 bit kernels. Well, we don't use different ABIs for kernel vs userspace so some kernels will get it wrong aswell, you just won't notice until moving to a different box because userspace is the same. > + > + /* must be padded to 64 bit alignment */ > } xfs_dsb_t; I'm pretty sure there is some gcc __packed__ magic to enfore that, might it be worth to poke some gcc experts to add it? But the actual patch looks fine, ACK from me. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch] Prevent excessive xfsaild wakeups, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Is CVS stable?, David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch] detect and correct bad features2 superblock field, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch] detect and correct bad features2 superblock field, David Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |