[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Differences in mkfs.xfs and xfs_info output.

To: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Differences in mkfs.xfs and xfs_info output.
From: Jan Derfinak <ja@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 03:10:19 +0100 (CET)
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20080219014619.GY155407@xxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0802160149590.4592@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080216074019.GV155407@xxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0802162319300.6528@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080217230645.GY155407@xxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0802180015110.4514@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0802190044350.8907@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080219002059.GX155407@xxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0802190209490.20408@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080219014619.GY155407@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, David Chinner wrote:

> I did not use a patched mkfs - just my patch that does correction.
> I think I need to test this on an x86_64 box and see if i can
> reproduce it locally because it's not obviously operator error
> or clearly an 32/64bit problem...

Will you have possibility to test it in near future or should I rather
recreate my FS's with lazy-count=0 to keep the data safe?

Maybe this information can be useful. Kernel and userspace tools were
compiled with:
# gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-suse-linux
Configured with: ../configure --enable-threads=posix --prefix=/usr
--with-local-prefix=/usr/local --infodir=/usr/share/info
--mandir=/usr/share/man --libdir=/usr/lib64 --libexecdir=/usr/lib64
--enable-checking=release --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.2.1
--enable-ssp --disable-libssp --disable-libgcj --with-slibdir=/lib64
--with-system-zlib --enable-shared --enable-__cxa_atexit
--enable-libstdcxx-allocator=new --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--program-suffix=-4.2 --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs
--without-system-libunwind --with-cpu=generic --host=x86_64-suse-linux
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.1 (SUSE Linux)



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>