[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Differences in mkfs.xfs and xfs_info output.

To: Jan Derfinak <ja@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Differences in mkfs.xfs and xfs_info output.
From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:20:59 +1100
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0802190044350.8907@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0802160149590.4592@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080216074019.GV155407@xxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0802162319300.6528@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080217230645.GY155407@xxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0802180015110.4514@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0802190044350.8907@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 01:04:35AM +0100, Jan Derfinak wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Jan Derfinak wrote:
> > > with dd and rm'ing a subset of the files before unmounting?
> > > I've run some simple tests this morning that do this, and I
> > > don't see any issues. I'd like to confirm that simple cases
> > 
> > Did you use x86_64 and latest CVS kernel?
> I have run the mount,umount test on x86 architecture with the same kernel
> source version. Kernel image is of course different, it is different
> computer.
> On x86 everything is ok.
> I guess that problem is in 64-bit architecture. Is it possible?

The output I showed you was from an ia64 machine, so it's not
purely 64bit related.

Can you rebuild you x86_64 kernel from the same kernel
tree you built the ia32 (make mrproper; make ....) and reinstall
it and see if the still exists?


Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>