xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.25

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.25
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 22:58:53 -0600
Cc: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20080209045645.GB1428@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20080208022705.0DB1058C4C11@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47AD284F.7080603@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20080209045645.GB1428@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031)
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 10:13:03PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
>>> Please pull from the for-linus branch:
>>>     git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
>>>
>>> This will update the following files:
>>>
>>>  fs/xfs/Makefile-linux-2.6      |    1 -
>> Is there a reason the other various makefile updates still haven't been
>> pushed?  They're a lot tidier now, and they facilitate out-of-tree
>> building...
> 
> Well, the makefiles are pretty different for CVS vs mainline to modular
> quota and dmapi.  I'm thinking about doing a proof of concept modular
> quota patch for mainline and if it doesn't get too ugly that would
> mean the makefiles are a lot more in sync.

Even if they differ, they can still get the same basic treatment.  I'll
make a patch if desired.  The current kernel.org makefiles are a mess,
IMHO :)

-Eric


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>