| To: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: unpushed 4-month-old mods? |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 7 Feb 2008 01:39:29 -0500 |
| Cc: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20080204044611.GF155407@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <47A694F3.9010307@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20080204044611.GF155407@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) |
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 03:46:11PM +1100, David Chinner wrote: > On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 10:30:43PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > At least these three mods which I did back in September to get Fedora 8 > > / 2.6.23 into shape on 4k stacks, and a bugfix, are still not pushed to > > kernel.org, and are missing in 2.6.24... > > > > Is there any reason for the holdup? Makes me wonder what else isn't > > pushed... > > The holdup is that we drew a line in the sand for the 2.6.24 before > 2.6.23 was released. We did this because of the massive amount of invasive > change we already had queued up for 2.6.24. All those mods that got > held up will be pushed into 2.6.25 release. For which it's getting about time. The merge window started about with LCA, so by the tradition 2 weeks rule it'll close by the end of the week.. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH V2] make inode reclaim synchronise with xfs_iflush_done(), Lachlan McIlroy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH V2] make inode reclaim synchronise with xfs_iflush_done(), David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: unpushed 4-month-old mods?, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 1/1] XFS: Replace custom AIL linked-list code with struct list_head, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |