| To: | "Linda A. Walsh" <law@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: %inodes question |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:20:51 -0600 |
| Cc: | xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <47A90A38.3050206@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <47A90A38.3050206@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) |
Linda A. Walsh wrote: > Does this really matter much anymore? It defaults to 25%, but > on a 1T disk, that's 250G "reserved"(?) for inodes? Even 1% > still gives you 10G of inodes. Not any more. xfsprogs 2.9.5 will put it at 5% for a 1T fs. And it's not reserved per se; it's just the maximum. Inodes are allocated dynamically up to that point. -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: RAID needs more to survive a power hit, different /boot layout for example (was Re: draft howto on making raids for surviving a disk crash), Michael Tokarev |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH 1/1] XFS: Replace custom AIL linked-list code with struct list_head, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek |
| Previous by Thread: | %inodes question, Linda A. Walsh |
| Next by Thread: | TAKE 971186 - add __init/__exit mark to specific init/cleanup functions, Lachlan McIlroy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |