| To: | Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC, patch 1/2] Allow up to 1GB logs in mkfs.xfs |
| From: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:17:43 +1100 |
| Cc: | markgw@xxxxxxx, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-dev <xfs-dev@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <47C21A67.1010706@sgi.com> |
| References: | <20080221230833.GG155407@sgi.com> <ncctzk11zhl.fsf@sgi.com> <20080222050301.GP155407@sgi.com> <47BE6122.5040007@sgi.com> <20080222065338.GQ155407@sgi.com> <47C21585.8030504@sgi.com> <47C21A67.1010706@sgi.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 12:31:19PM +1100, Lachlan McIlroy wrote: > Does a larger on-disk log mean we can have a lot more items in the AIL? Yes. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [xfs-masters] Re: filesystem corruption on xfs after 2.6.25-rc1 (bisected, powerpc related?), Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] kill t_sema member of struct xfs_trans, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC, patch 1/2] Allow up to 1GB logs in mkfs.xfs, Lachlan McIlroy |
| Next by Thread: | [RFC, patch 2/2] xfsqa test to check log size scaling, David Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |