Re: [REVIEW] User-space support for bad_features2 patch

[Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Barry Naujok wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 04:41:55 +1100, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>  
> wrote:

...

>> My only thought here is that if you repair it, then use an older kernel
>> w/o the fix, suddenly your fs behavior changes, whereas before you often
>> got lucky, and both userspace & kernelspace swapped the same way, and
>> you found the bits you were looking for out of luck :)  (same goes for
>> the recent kernel fix too, I guess)
> 
> I believe the kernel code never tried to access "bad_features2" part
> of the superblock, it always did the correct thing (correct me if I'm
> wrong of course :).

I'm fairly sure that it did; both userspace & kernelspace were doing the
same thing, and endian-flipping "too much" ... but I'd have to test
again to be sure.

-Eric