xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Marking inode dirty latency > 1000 msec on XFS!

To: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Marking inode dirty latency > 1000 msec on XFS!
From: Török Edwin <edwintorok@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:40:22 +0200
Cc: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5diMzxKGxtRuof8p1+r81/HQeOHJC2AkR1OrX19+wFc=; b=i09sRMkjm5MzbuL8PQXlShXXIX7Vyrlbv++BcHNnVoEvRB94iAFmXLpT+sLpQIpSioqsE8tSlpTHElRdc5e6K+yxsocFKI9r/qqGmyw3OA6Q0UZBcLEdZMCk2gyDwxSKXuaz5/ep0qya508PWUOAaQeNLcmGSpn/qar3DNzmJSI=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=feQohl3fiT0UvoViZfca4L70vMmrxAItn2qmXIvYwPF3YnQ2kLPeGv7AglYfBwwaRZqOAg9dZVedrMe/YvqMaCrdz5oa8zEbfMWVedl3MAsSYbK6fi3MNYOipdrL87CLitvyJeKwxkW7ZBacTOaq6W6Z9sD29Xm/9SprOnjXd8o=
In-reply-to: <20080222071608.GT155407@sgi.com>
References: <47B5DD9C.3080906@gmail.com> <47BE6C5C.2000605@sgi.com> <20080222071608.GT155407@sgi.com>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080109)
David Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 05:31:56PM +1100, Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
>   
>> Török Edwin wrote:
>>     
>>> FWIW, this is a slow laptop hdd (5400 rpm, ST96812AS), but latency of 1
>>> second is still big.
>>>
>>> Are there any settings I can tweak to reduce latency?
>>>       
>> Um, not that I am aware of.
>>     
>
> Try using a filesystem that has lazy-count enabled.

How do I activate lazy-count on an already existing filesystem?
I tried using xfs_db, but AFAICT it cannot activate features2 flags.
I am using 2.9.6-1, should I checkout xfsprogs from CVS?

Thanks,
--Edwin


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>