| To: | Jan Derfinak <ja@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Differences in mkfs.xfs and xfs_info output. |
| From: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:42:16 +1100 |
| Cc: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.63.0802191458080.4320@alienAngel.home.sk> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.63.0802160149590.4592@alienAngel.home.sk> <20080216074019.GV155407@sgi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0802162319300.6528@alienAngel.home.sk> <20080217230645.GY155407@sgi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0802180015110.4514@alienAngel.home.sk> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0802190044350.8907@alienAngel.home.sk> <20080219002059.GX155407@sgi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0802190209490.20408@alienAngel.home.sk> <20080219014619.GY155407@sgi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0802191458080.4320@alienAngel.home.sk> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 03:05:32PM +0100, Jan Derfinak wrote: > On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, David Chinner wrote: > > > I did not use a patched mkfs - just my patch that does correction. > > I tried with only your patch. The result is slightly different, but > not correct. Ok, still 1024 blocks out. Still need to reproduce it locally. FYI - thisis not a corruption bug - just an accounting problem. IOWs, all it will cause is slightly premature detection of ENOSPC.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [patch] detect and correct bad features2 superblock field, David Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [patch] Prevent excessive xfsaild wakeups, David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Differences in mkfs.xfs and xfs_info output., Jan Derfinak |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Differences in mkfs.xfs and xfs_info output., Jan Derfinak |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |