| To: | "Hannes Dorbath" <light@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: tuning, many small files, small blocksize |
| From: | "Jeff Breidenbach" <jeff@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 16 Feb 2008 02:24:14 -0800 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=EGm7CwXh7afgZHC/WvWBvqPoUS0hkbTPHFQMxLQMRSo=; b=wQNtFy6Fz4xdbDJahsV1hUXQR7sXii8MDtftKWXrsY6L5cT1kVAwQv9dPJUApCw8X5xN+G8Eyq/8l+d20lymXVh0U2vZSUVDqPGaoeTdo5Edylc2+9iA5iDIbqZGMfmrKPv+kmB9mEO+5q40WFIASN//vWA1l6d5Kw/ae0ZR9aA= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=j/cGIMChJICLmkKPGC/D+gt/a7zlSCpyFN+tXolUwHU6cP+aAsRIngyDiPwK5cZOc+nCrKw1TgsC64/VRZEyTENJN2+LW6Hx4l+zPw2Wt86TENOABdtWjbNDkDi2mT0enQ25KGW7NTTNlbV+7MnA7jjxw/dK9Z5TiFIDvbP2C0E= |
| In-reply-to: | <47B6ACC5.3030605@theendofthetunnel.de> |
| References: | <e03b90ae0802152101t2bfa4644kcca5d6329239f9ff@mail.gmail.com> <47B6ACC5.3030605@theendofthetunnel.de> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> That's maybe a bit paranoid, but on the other hand it should give good > parallelism. Yes, the goal is fast read performance for small files. > mkfs.xfs -n size=16k -i attr=2 -l lazy-count=1,version=2,size=32m -b > size=512 /dev/sda > > mount -onoatime,logbufs=8,logbsize=256k /dev/sda /mnt/xfs This is highly appreciated, thank you very much. > Requires kernel 2.6.23 and xfsprogs 2.9.5. As said, you might want to > use an external log device. I'm running vendor a supplied kernel of 2.6.22 and a quick test shows the unsupported feature is lazy-count. How big a deal is it? Upgrading the kernel before April is painful but I'll do it if important. Presumably there's no simple way to migrate a non-lazy xfs filesytem to a lazy one. PS. I don't know if this affects any parameters, but the biggest directory will have approximately 1.5 million files. There are a few in the one to two hundred thousand range, and then very many in the tens of thousands. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: tuning, many small files, small blocksize, Hannes Dorbath |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: tuning, many small files, small blocksize, pg_xfs2 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: tuning, many small files, small blocksize, Hannes Dorbath |
| Next by Thread: | Re: tuning, many small files, small blocksize, Jeff Breidenbach |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |