| To: | "Mark Magpayo" <mmagpayo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Repairing a possibly incomplete xfs_growfs command? |
| From: | "Barry Naujok" <bnaujok@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:02:09 +1100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <9CE70E6ED2C2F64FB5537A2973FA4F02535973@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | SGI |
| References: | <9CE70E6ED2C2F64FB5537A2973FA4F0253595A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080117234604.GG155407@xxxxxxx> <9CE70E6ED2C2F64FB5537A2973FA4F0253595B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080119004018.GH155407@xxxxxxx> <9CE70E6ED2C2F64FB5537A2973FA4F0253596D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <op.t5c3ubfg3jf8g2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <9CE70E6ED2C2F64FB5537A2973FA4F02535973@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Opera Mail/9.24 (Win32) |
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 04:24:17 +1100, Mark Magpayo <mmagpayo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Was it stuck on Phase 6 all that time? With only 1GB of RAM (from your meminfo output) and 18TB filesystem, Phases 3 and 4 will take a very long time due to swapping.It's been stuck on Phase 6 since I came back to check on it on Monday.Phase 6 in your scenario should be relatively quick and light on memory usage (500MB as reported in your other email). It is feasible it is deadlocked by trying to double-access a buffer, or access a buffer that wasn't released. This is an unlikely scenario, but it is possible.Could I break out of the process here? Seems like most of the repair work has been done... Then again, I imagine traversing the filesystem is a pretty important step. Breaking repair is fine. Are there any more phases after this by the way? Checking nlink counts in Phase 7 is the last. I would run xfs_check to see if there are any errors remaining. The other thing I can suggest is to run an older repair from the 2.8.x series (2.8.21) with the options "-M -o bhash=512". This should finish. Regards, Barry. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS doesn't correctly account for IO-Wait for directory reading, David Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs_rapair memory requirement per TB, Barry Naujok |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Repairing a possibly incomplete xfs_growfs command?, Mark Magpayo |
| Next by Thread: | Returned mail: see transcript for details, Mail Delivery Subsystem |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |