xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: small problem w/ new xfs defaults patch

To: Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: small problem w/ new xfs defaults patch
From: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:28:03 +1100
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20080121051341.GA31708862@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4794159F.9070505@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20080121051341.GA31708862@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031)
Niv Sardi wrote:
* Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> [2008-01-20 21:46:39 -0600]:

Index: xfsprogs-2.9.4/growfs/xfs_growfs.c
===================================================================
[...]
couple things... you lost a "\n" off the end of the data section there...

That has been fixed, I guess it needs to be sent to oss  (barry?)

Also, do you really want to drop reporting of unwritten extents?  Even
if you're disallowing the selection on new mkfs's there may still be
different flavors of filesystems in existence, should it still be reported?

I don't really care, whatever the oss/xfs-master people like best.

Cheers

My preference would be to report the unwritten extent flag as Eric suggested.

--Tim


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>