| To: | Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: small problem w/ new xfs defaults patch |
| From: | Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:28:03 +1100 |
| Cc: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20080121051341.GA31708862@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4794159F.9070505@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20080121051341.GA31708862@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) |
Niv Sardi wrote: * Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> [2008-01-20 21:46:39 -0600]:Index: xfsprogs-2.9.4/growfs/xfs_growfs.c ===================================================================[...]couple things... you lost a "\n" off the end of the data section there...That has been fixed, I guess it needs to be sent to oss (barry?)Also, do you really want to drop reporting of unwritten extents? Even if you're disallowing the selection on new mkfs's there may still be different flavors of filesystems in existence, should it still be reported?I don't really care, whatever the oss/xfs-master people like best. Cheers My preference would be to report the unwritten extent flag as Eric suggested. --Tim |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Known prob: MAX_LOCK_DEPTH too low?, Peter Zijlstra |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [patch] reduce log I/O latency V2, Lachlan McIlroy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: small problem w/ new xfs defaults patch, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | [patch] reduce log I/O latency V2, David Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |