| To: | Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Known prob: MAX_LOCK_DEPTH too low? |
| From: | Linda Walsh <lkml@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:26:40 -0800 |
| Cc: | LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux-Xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1200918448.6341.5.camel@lappy> |
| References: | <47914FA7.1000807@xxxxxxxxx> <1200918448.6341.5.camel@lappy> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) |
Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 17:17 -0800, Linda Walsh wrote:On my x86_64 machine, I got the following message in log (kern = 2.6.23.14) Jan 16 04:08:38 Astara kernel: BUG: MAX_LOCK_DEPTH too low!Jan 16 04:08:38 Astara kernel: turning off the locking correctness validator.Have no idea what caused it as I found the message on my console somewhat after the fact. The system had been up over 24 hours and is still running. System still seems 'fine' (been up 3 days now), so you can treat this as a "data point".Are you perhaps an XFS user? ---- Funny you should mention that... yes. However, there were no other messages that seem to indicate that the message had anything to do with XFS. Nice shot in the dark. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | PARTIAL TAKE 971186 - kill xfs_root, Lachlan McIlroy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Known prob: MAX_LOCK_DEPTH too low?, Peter Zijlstra |
| Previous by Thread: | PARTIAL TAKE 971186 - kill xfs_root, Lachlan McIlroy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Known prob: MAX_LOCK_DEPTH too low?, Peter Zijlstra |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |