| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: small problem w/ new xfs defaults patch |
| From: | Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:13:41 +1100 |
| Cc: | xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <4794159F.9070505@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4794159F.9070505@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
* Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> [2008-01-20 21:46:39 -0600]: > Index: xfsprogs-2.9.4/growfs/xfs_growfs.c > =================================================================== [...] > couple things... you lost a "\n" off the end of the data section there... That has been fixed, I guess it needs to be sent to oss (barry?) > Also, do you really want to drop reporting of unwritten extents? Even > if you're disallowing the selection on new mkfs's there may still be > different flavors of filesystems in existence, should it still be reported? I don't really care, whatever the oss/xfs-master people like best. Cheers -- Niv |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [patch] remove xfs_icluster, David Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [patch] Use xfs_inode_clean() in more places, David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | small problem w/ new xfs defaults patch, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: small problem w/ new xfs defaults patch, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |